Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/ The Business Impact of IT Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:50:57 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1 hourly 1 By: articlesubmission http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-18760 articlesubmission Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:43:58 +0000 #comment-18760 nice post...thanks for sharing nice post…thanks for sharing

]]> By: Is E2.0 Optional? | Social Media Group http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-18460 Is E2.0 Optional? | Social Media Group Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:08:20 +0000 #comment-18460 [...] sessions I was able to attend however, were outstanding. I have long been a proponent of all things Enterprise 2.0 and it was refreshing to be in the company of a group of like-minded people. The conference is [...] [...] sessions I was able to attend however, were outstanding. I have long been a proponent of all things Enterprise 2.0 and it was refreshing to be in the company of a group of like-minded people. The conference is [...]

]]> By: kris http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2617 kris Wed, 16 May 2007 07:41:21 +0000 #comment-2617 The reason this is so confusing is the use of ORIENTED in the TLA. WhatÂ’s that about? Is it akin to some form of IT sexual orientation? Is it an optional response? WTF does it mean?? IMO it should be services BASED architecture. Much easier to understand and closer to reality from what I see in the field. The reason this is so confusing is the use of ORIENTED in the TLA. WhatÂ’s that about? Is it akin to some form of IT sexual orientation? Is it an optional response? WTF does it mean?? IMO it should be services BASED architecture. Much easier to understand and closer to reality from what I see in the field.

]]> By: maklfili http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2625 maklfili Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:14:07 +0000 #comment-2625 By: mokqiua http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2624 mokqiua Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:42:48 +0000 #comment-2624 By: cd6495a39500ced7d1fc689c001b3aca http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2623 cd6495a39500ced7d1fc689c001b3aca Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:59:37 +0000 #comment-2623 By: Spooler_Go_91 http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2622 Spooler_Go_91 Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:45:26 +0000 #comment-2622 By: Spooler_Go_83 http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2621 Spooler_Go_83 Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:51:28 +0000 #comment-2621 By: Paul Reeves http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2616 Paul Reeves Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:50:32 +0000 #comment-2616 2 points: 1. unstructured data invites a non-egalitarian system as it discourages usage by people unable to quickly and effectively parse poorly written text (good writing is revision and sweat). 2. Structures evolve from previous structures. I do not think they emerge. The lack of structure in data means the data is not useful in the enterprise. Enterprise wikis, for example, should provide configurable structures and workflows for data to be truly useful. Provide a decision making template that groups can use to propose, debate, select and monitor a policy over time and you have a killer app. As long as the structure provides for basic and complex data types, it can evolve as necessary. 2 points:
1. unstructured data invites a non-egalitarian system as it discourages usage by people unable to quickly and effectively parse poorly written text (good writing is revision and sweat).

2. Structures evolve from previous structures. I do not think they emerge. The lack of structure in data means the data is not useful in the enterprise. Enterprise wikis, for example, should provide configurable structures and workflows for data to be truly useful. Provide a decision making template that groups can use to propose, debate, select and monitor a policy over time and you have a killer app.
As long as the structure provides for basic and complex data types, it can evolve as necessary.

]]> By: Tomasz http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/05/enterprise_20_vs_soa/comment-page-1/#comment-2615 Tomasz Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:17:50 +0000 #comment-2615 Your definitions of - and comparisons between - SOA and Enterprise 2.0 Social Software identify some important differences. It seems to me that for the true potential of Enterprise 2.0 to emerge, business leaders need to be educated and be willing to support/admit the value of freeform social software as an enterprise software tool that delivers real personal and team productivity gains. Your definitions of – and comparisons between – SOA and Enterprise 2.0 Social Software identify some important differences. It seems to me that for the true potential of Enterprise 2.0 to emerge, business leaders need to be educated and be willing to support/admit the value of freeform social software as an enterprise software tool that delivers real personal and team productivity gains.

]]>