<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relishing the Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/</link>
	<description>The Business Impact of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:35:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: max191</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-18869</link>
		<dc:creator>max191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18869</guid>
		<description>I had been looking for this product. Finally I found it in your blog. Thank you so much for the information&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;weber grill recipes&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been looking for this product. Finally I found it in your blog. Thank you so much for the information<br />regards<br /><a rel="dofollow" href="http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com" rel="nofollow">weber grill recipes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spooler_Go_12</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Spooler_Go_12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2692</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indus Khaitan</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Indus Khaitan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>The threat of dumbing down is very much there. Very few people in the corporate environment understand the difference between a page coming out of a traditional CMS and a page collaboratively built using a Wiki. 

The dumbing down is done by the same people who are watching the success of Wikis, Blogs, etc. on the public internet but fear that it would rouse the fire within the walls.

Whatever be the circumstances -- I have personally seen grassroot level sparks, people trying to use these tools internally without any corporate backing and without any IT support. However long the time it takes, the future of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.khaitan.org/mt/archives/000126.html&quot;&gt;Writable Intranet&lt;/a&gt; is very much on its way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The threat of dumbing down is very much there. Very few people in the corporate environment understand the difference between a page coming out of a traditional CMS and a page collaboratively built using a Wiki. </p>
<p>The dumbing down is done by the same people who are watching the success of Wikis, Blogs, etc. on the public internet but fear that it would rouse the fire within the walls.</p>
<p>Whatever be the circumstances &#8212; I have personally seen grassroot level sparks, people trying to use these tools internally without any corporate backing and without any IT support. However long the time it takes, the future of <a href="http://www.khaitan.org/mt/archives/000126.html">Writable Intranet</a> is very much on its way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parisista</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Parisista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2691</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Treem</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2689</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Treem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 19:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2689</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

I completely agree with your argument in favor of transparency as a way to further thinking. However, collaboration in the enterprise is often hampered by the perception that advancement is a zero-sum game. In this setting an individual who discloses information without knowledge that similar disclosure will be reciprocated is at a disadvantage.

That is why it is so important for management to model and incent collaborative behaviors. Internal transparency must come from the top of the organization, because management already has an information advantage over those under them. The rational behavior is for employees to limit discretionary effort (i.e., collaboration) because they are unsure whether they or that behavior will be rewarded. However, if management demonstrates a legitimate commitment to collaboration and collaborative tools (such as making it a part of performance evaluations) they then start rewarding   participation in a larger conversation that moves the organization forward, instead of singular efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>I completely agree with your argument in favor of transparency as a way to further thinking. However, collaboration in the enterprise is often hampered by the perception that advancement is a zero-sum game. In this setting an individual who discloses information without knowledge that similar disclosure will be reciprocated is at a disadvantage.</p>
<p>That is why it is so important for management to model and incent collaborative behaviors. Internal transparency must come from the top of the organization, because management already has an information advantage over those under them. The rational behavior is for employees to limit discretionary effort (i.e., collaboration) because they are unsure whether they or that behavior will be rewarded. However, if management demonstrates a legitimate commitment to collaboration and collaborative tools (such as making it a part of performance evaluations) they then start rewarding   participation in a larger conversation that moves the organization forward, instead of singular efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Otter</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/07/relishing_the_conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>Andrew
Your occasional references to Weber, Hume, Jefferson and Smith remind me that we can learn much from sociology and political theory as we explore new technologies, both in the workplace and in broader society.  Weber, Marx and Mill on bureaucracy can teach us more about modern organisations and enterprise 2.0 than most of us realise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew<br />
Your occasional references to Weber, Hume, Jefferson and Smith remind me that we can learn much from sociology and political theory as we explore new technologies, both in the workplace and in broader society.  Weber, Marx and Mill on bureaucracy can teach us more about modern organisations and enterprise 2.0 than most of us realise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
