<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Agree with Tom.  And Yet&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/</link>
	<description>The Business Impact of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBC</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-20489</link>
		<dc:creator>HBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20489</guid>
		<description>very nice post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBC</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-19263</link>
		<dc:creator>HBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19263</guid>
		<description>very nice post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staffingpowers</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-19162</link>
		<dc:creator>staffingpowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19162</guid>
		<description>Hii im james and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.connectbeam.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.connectbeam.com&lt;/a&gt; this site very useful for us. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hii im james and <a href="http://www.connectbeam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.connectbeam.com</a> this site very useful for us. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmtueeoo</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>jmtueeoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2740</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spooler_Go_6</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Spooler_Go_6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2739</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mandel</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ll bite on the most important comment in your post -- *what* is the single blog, non work-related, that you read every day, Andrew?

On, to some, a more important point: enterprise technologies are adopted, in virtually every case, because of user pull or the messy results thereof. Why enterprise databases? Because departments installed databases on their minicomputers, and information wouldn&#039;t move among them? Why erp? Because information management software in various departments couldn&#039;t easily be used for a more synoptic view. Why internet email? Because usage overwhelmed all other systems. Why a corporate LAN? Because users set up local networks in their areas.

(btw, you can tell the slashdot nerds some of this; they imagine that like Minerva from Zeus, infrastructure sprang whole from their bodies).

User pull will lead to wikis being a standard offering on the enterprise network too. Unfortunately, in this case it&#039;s hard to predict which if any vendor will flourish because of this (wikis encompass very little technology).

But, social bookmarking and tagging, and social networking as well, will influence enterprise software architecture enormously. Still below the horizon, they will nonetheless overtake wikis as an issue within 18 months. I recommend taking a good long look at http://www.connectbeam.com for more on this. (disclosure: I am helping them and own some of the company -- don&#039;t let this dissuade you)

This comment is too long already, so I won&#039;t initiate a lengthy explanation of why the above. Simply pose the following to yourself: I&#039;m having a meeting in Paris in two days on one of our products. i know that the key person in the meeting will want to know how my product integrates with X. How do I find someone in my company who a) understands this particular product of ours, b) has worked with X, and c) if possible is located somewhere near Paris?

The problem of *agile access* to information and people who have information is not addressed in current generation enterprise software. It is the next step -- companies like connectbeam are taking that step (sorry for the shameless self-promotion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll bite on the most important comment in your post &#8212; *what* is the single blog, non work-related, that you read every day, Andrew?</p>
<p>On, to some, a more important point: enterprise technologies are adopted, in virtually every case, because of user pull or the messy results thereof. Why enterprise databases? Because departments installed databases on their minicomputers, and information wouldn&#8217;t move among them? Why erp? Because information management software in various departments couldn&#8217;t easily be used for a more synoptic view. Why internet email? Because usage overwhelmed all other systems. Why a corporate LAN? Because users set up local networks in their areas.</p>
<p>(btw, you can tell the slashdot nerds some of this; they imagine that like Minerva from Zeus, infrastructure sprang whole from their bodies).</p>
<p>User pull will lead to wikis being a standard offering on the enterprise network too. Unfortunately, in this case it&#8217;s hard to predict which if any vendor will flourish because of this (wikis encompass very little technology).</p>
<p>But, social bookmarking and tagging, and social networking as well, will influence enterprise software architecture enormously. Still below the horizon, they will nonetheless overtake wikis as an issue within 18 months. I recommend taking a good long look at <a href="http://www.connectbeam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.connectbeam.com</a> for more on this. (disclosure: I am helping them and own some of the company &#8212; don&#8217;t let this dissuade you)</p>
<p>This comment is too long already, so I won&#8217;t initiate a lengthy explanation of why the above. Simply pose the following to yourself: I&#8217;m having a meeting in Paris in two days on one of our products. i know that the key person in the meeting will want to know how my product integrates with X. How do I find someone in my company who a) understands this particular product of ours, b) has worked with X, and c) if possible is located somewhere near Paris?</p>
<p>The problem of *agile access* to information and people who have information is not addressed in current generation enterprise software. It is the next step &#8212; companies like connectbeam are taking that step (sorry for the shameless self-promotion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Halligan</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Halligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>I am a big believer in enterprise2.0 and have been following the adoption of web2.0 in business for a couple of years now.  I may be in the minority, but I&#039;m at the point where I cringe a bit every time I see another interview with DrKW.  There is nothing wrong with what he is saying, it is just that he has been the only C-level enterprise IT exec talking about the benefits of these technologies for a over a year now.  We need to find a couple of more poster children to move of through the chasm-cycle lest we get stuck!

I spent four years at Groove Networks.  The first year or two we had our own DrKW -- it was Ford Calhoun, the CIO at GSK.  We eventually got some additional ones, but (frankly) not quickly enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big believer in enterprise2.0 and have been following the adoption of web2.0 in business for a couple of years now.  I may be in the minority, but I&#8217;m at the point where I cringe a bit every time I see another interview with DrKW.  There is nothing wrong with what he is saying, it is just that he has been the only C-level enterprise IT exec talking about the benefits of these technologies for a over a year now.  We need to find a couple of more poster children to move of through the chasm-cycle lest we get stuck!</p>
<p>I spent four years at Groove Networks.  The first year or two we had our own DrKW &#8212; it was Ford Calhoun, the CIO at GSK.  We eventually got some additional ones, but (frankly) not quickly enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>Blogs and wikis are often lumped together, but there is a huge difference: with a blog, the focus is still largely on communication, whereas using a wiki allows *creation*. Wikis shine when itÂ’s not the debate/discussion, the individual arguments/comments that matter, but the synthesis of the collective wisdom.
    &lt;br /&gt;
Tom appears to forget that wikis in a corporate environment are very different from public wikis on the Internet.  After the initial &quot;grassroots movement&quot;, if management fully embraces the wiki not as the primary facility to conduct work, it becomes the fabric of everyday business, is used by people of real identities and reputations, and most importantly shared objectives.
    &lt;br /&gt;
Finally, even though wikis solve a Knowledge Management problem (lack of input and GIGO), I believe they should not be considered KM tools at all at the workplace.  Typical KM is concerned with the collection, organization and redistribution of knowledge after-the-fact, while the wiki should become the primary platform to conduct everyday business tasks, and resolve the KM-problem as a by-product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs and wikis are often lumped together, but there is a huge difference: with a blog, the focus is still largely on communication, whereas using a wiki allows *creation*. Wikis shine when itÂ’s not the debate/discussion, the individual arguments/comments that matter, but the synthesis of the collective wisdom.<br />
    <br />
Tom appears to forget that wikis in a corporate environment are very different from public wikis on the Internet.  After the initial &#8220;grassroots movement&#8221;, if management fully embraces the wiki not as the primary facility to conduct work, it becomes the fabric of everyday business, is used by people of real identities and reputations, and most importantly shared objectives.<br />
    <br />
Finally, even though wikis solve a Knowledge Management problem (lack of input and GIGO), I believe they should not be considered KM tools at all at the workplace.  Typical KM is concerned with the collection, organization and redistribution of knowledge after-the-fact, while the wiki should become the primary platform to conduct everyday business tasks, and resolve the KM-problem as a by-product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc Fayard</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Fayard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve buyed your article on Enterprise 2.0, it&#039;s very interesting and I will quote you in my next edito (in the french magazine &quot;01 DSI&quot; , a management magazine for the french CIO&#039;s)...
But, but, is it a good way of promoting the 2.0 spirit if you set a fee of 6 $ for accessing your ideas???? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve buyed your article on Enterprise 2.0, it&#8217;s very interesting and I will quote you in my next edito (in the french magazine &#8220;01 DSI&#8221; , a management magazine for the french CIO&#8217;s)&#8230;<br />
But, but, is it a good way of promoting the 2.0 spirit if you set a fee of 6 $ for accessing your ideas???? <img src='http://andrewmcafee.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/i_agree_with_tom_and_yet/comment-page-1/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>Great blog!  I&#039;ve added a link to your blog on Blog of the Day under the category of Business.  To view the feature of your blog, please visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogoftheday.org/page/112213&quot;&gt;
http://blogoftheday.org/page/112213&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog!  I&#8217;ve added a link to your blog on Blog of the Day under the category of Business.  To view the feature of your blog, please visit <a href="http://blogoftheday.org/page/112213"><br />
</a><a href="http://blogoftheday.org/page/112213" rel="nofollow">http://blogoftheday.org/page/112213</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
