<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 9X Email Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/</link>
	<description>The Business Impact of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:50:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anup</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-19670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19670</guid>
		<description>Brilliant article. I suspect this is not only limited to  new products (or technology) but is applicable to &quot;any significant change people care about&quot;. Here (&lt;a href=&quot;http://softwareoverload.com/2010/03/01/healthcare-reform%25E2%2580%2599s-9x-email-problem/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://softwareoverload.com/2010/03/01/healthca...&lt;/a&gt;)  is my take on how this may explain why health care reform has died so died so many times in the past and is again in danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant article. I suspect this is not only limited to  new products (or technology) but is applicable to &#8220;any significant change people care about&#8221;. Here (<a href="http://softwareoverload.com/2010/03/01/healthcare-reform%25E2%2580%2599s-9x-email-problem/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://softwareoverload.com/2010/03/01/healthca.." rel="nofollow">http://softwareoverload.com/2010/03/01/healthca..</a>.)  is my take on how this may explain why health care reform has died so died so many times in the past and is again in danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart McRae</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-18906</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart McRae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18906</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. The Lotus Notes analogy in particular, for two reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lotus Notes actually precedes the widespread adoption of e-mail in business in the 1990s (although not the development of e-mail technology which started 30 years earlier). It&#039;s groupware capabilities was one of the things that gave it a competitive advantage over the alternatives and helped it become one of the two clear winners in the client/server e-mail war (it still has 40% of the enterprise e-mail client market). Today, the existence of collaborative applications built on it are a major reason why its market share remains stable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lotus has a clear strategy today of using Notes as the client to its &quot;Enterprise 2.0&quot; applications. Sure, a lot of the time, browsers are great. But for mobile users, slow networks, and companies who do not invest enough in a responsive infrastructure, a client with offline support is a major differentiator. So I&#039;d always though of the strategy in those terms, but your post brings another dimension to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we embed social collaboration into the same integrated client as e-mail, that can become the user&#039;s comfort app., and we can lead the gently into the new world without them feeling they have to give up the old one. Maybe that will turn out to be a stroke of genius (certainly, Matt Cain;s recent writing for Gartner around Notes seems to be very enthusiastic about this idea, although it is not expressed in these terms).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. The Lotus Notes analogy in particular, for two reasons.</p>
<p>Lotus Notes actually precedes the widespread adoption of e-mail in business in the 1990s (although not the development of e-mail technology which started 30 years earlier). It&#39;s groupware capabilities was one of the things that gave it a competitive advantage over the alternatives and helped it become one of the two clear winners in the client/server e-mail war (it still has 40% of the enterprise e-mail client market). Today, the existence of collaborative applications built on it are a major reason why its market share remains stable.</p>
<p>Lotus has a clear strategy today of using Notes as the client to its &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; applications. Sure, a lot of the time, browsers are great. But for mobile users, slow networks, and companies who do not invest enough in a responsive infrastructure, a client with offline support is a major differentiator. So I&#39;d always though of the strategy in those terms, but your post brings another dimension to it.</p>
<p>If we embed social collaboration into the same integrated client as e-mail, that can become the user&#39;s comfort app., and we can lead the gently into the new world without them feeling they have to give up the old one. Maybe that will turn out to be a stroke of genius (certainly, Matt Cain;s recent writing for Gartner around Notes seems to be very enthusiastic about this idea, although it is not expressed in these terms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixbook</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-18585</link>
		<dc:creator>pixbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18585</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.101waystomakemoney.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ways to make money&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great article. thanks for sharing your creative thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.101waystomakemoney.com" rel="nofollow">Ways to make money</a></p>
<p>Great article. thanks for sharing your creative thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dutchx5</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-12727</link>
		<dc:creator>dutchx5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12727</guid>
		<description>i buy all my poker supplies @  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pokerchipsnmore.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.pokerchipsnmore.com&lt;/a&gt; they are the best and the cheepest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i buy all my poker supplies @  <a href="http://www.pokerchipsnmore.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pokerchipsnmore.com</a> they are the best and the cheepest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Girton</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator>George Girton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2771</guid>
		<description>Goureville&#039;s two-page paper on &quot;why consumers don&#039;t buy&#039; is for sale on this website for $6.95 -- a high ratio of pages to pricing, in this non buyer&#039;s opinion.  Go ahead, call me loss-averse.

I don&#039;t buy the 1-to-nine ratio as a threshold for adoption either.  I don&#039;t think Goureville could possibly have meant that.

Stuff that spreads by wildfire generally does something completely new, rather than offering an incremental improvement, no matter how large the increment may be.  When something stands head and shoulders above the rest, it&#039;s often because it&#039;s a completely different animal, not just a larger beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goureville&#8217;s two-page paper on &#8220;why consumers don&#8217;t buy&#8217; is for sale on this website for $6.95 &#8212; a high ratio of pages to pricing, in this non buyer&#8217;s opinion.  Go ahead, call me loss-averse.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy the 1-to-nine ratio as a threshold for adoption either.  I don&#8217;t think Goureville could possibly have meant that.</p>
<p>Stuff that spreads by wildfire generally does something completely new, rather than offering an incremental improvement, no matter how large the increment may be.  When something stands head and shoulders above the rest, it&#8217;s often because it&#8217;s a completely different animal, not just a larger beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kishore Balakrishnan</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Kishore Balakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>Reg the statement &quot;So the new tools are not direct substitutes for email; instead, they&#039;re intended to provide capabilities that email can&#039;t.&quot;

Has there been direct substitutes for email in the past ? which have not succeeded ? (and therefore?) Is it wrong for to work on new tools that can substitute email for collaboration ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reg the statement &#8220;So the new tools are not direct substitutes for email; instead, they&#8217;re intended to provide capabilities that email can&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p>Has there been direct substitutes for email in the past ? which have not succeeded ? (and therefore?) Is it wrong for to work on new tools that can substitute email for collaboration ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Iliff</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Iliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>Andrew, sometimes we (well, me) misunderstand a newly introduced concept, but continue to mentally build it into something that is perhaps useful. When I first read this posting, I thought of the &quot;endowment&quot; as the benefits of collaboration given collectively back to the corporation by its employees; a higher form of &quot;work&quot;. People already get paid to work, so why collaborate? Why give more than what is paid for? No one can be held accountable for failing to deliver the fruits of collaboration. So how does the company create an environment to secure this endowment? It&#039;s more than giving employees sharper tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, sometimes we (well, me) misunderstand a newly introduced concept, but continue to mentally build it into something that is perhaps useful. When I first read this posting, I thought of the &#8220;endowment&#8221; as the benefits of collaboration given collectively back to the corporation by its employees; a higher form of &#8220;work&#8221;. People already get paid to work, so why collaborate? Why give more than what is paid for? No one can be held accountable for failing to deliver the fruits of collaboration. So how does the company create an environment to secure this endowment? It&#8217;s more than giving employees sharper tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tzbuubum</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>tzbuubum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 06:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2780</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rimrogdebnw</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>rimrogdebnw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2779</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pzswythhwe</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>pzswythhwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2778</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
