<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boundary Spanning at Office 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/</link>
	<description>The Business Impact of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-20290</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20290</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I congratulate you for this blog. &lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve really enjoyed. I sincerely thank you again.&lt;br&gt;________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchofficespace.com/uk/office-space/liverpool-street-serviced-offices.html &quot; rel=follow &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Liverpool Street Serviced Offices&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I congratulate you for this blog. <br />I&#39;ve really enjoyed. I sincerely thank you again.<br />________________________<br /><a href="http://www.searchofficespace.com/uk/office-space/liverpool-street-serviced-offices.html " rel=follow " rel="nofollow"> Liverpool Street Serviced Offices</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Brison</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Brison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>Many have been the efforts to make application development into a task that is natural for the Â‘ordinaryÂ’ user. Many have been the failures. Indeed, this was the idea behind JotSpot (just sold to Google), which debuted calling itself Â“the application wiki.Â”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many have been the efforts to make application development into a task that is natural for the Â‘ordinaryÂ’ user. Many have been the failures. Indeed, this was the idea behind JotSpot (just sold to Google), which debuted calling itself Â“the application wiki.Â”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Jones</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>WeÂ’re integrating wiki, blog, and tagging functionality, and are very aware of the need to be as easy to use as email.  Neither the application nor the marketing web site are available for evalutation yet, but I will let you know when they are, hopefully by the end of November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WeÂ’re integrating wiki, blog, and tagging functionality, and are very aware of the need to be as easy to use as email.  Neither the application nor the marketing web site are available for evalutation yet, but I will let you know when they are, hopefully by the end of November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgtdyhdyo</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>bgtdyhdyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2799</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Steffen</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Steffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>In addition to Coghead I would also like to bring Interneer Intellect to your attention.

Intellect is a web-based, user-friendly system that allows the average person, with or without knowledge of computer programming, to easily build fully-functional and extremely useful business applications.  Intellect automates the processes needed to deliver results with easy to Intellect is fully configurable without coding, companies gain the flexibility to adapt to change, eliminating the need for costly software modifications in the future.  

Intellect&#039;s Instant Application Framework makes it simple to quickly create dynamic forms, interactive tables, workflow diagrams and collaboration tools such as due date notifications and sign-off requests.  As a result, the typical business user is empowered to configure the system whenever necessary, even if he or she has no knowledge of computer programming.  If you can get by in Excel, you can build sophisticated applications with Intellect.  Intellect allows for levels of flexibility and user-control not possible with hard-coded applications, at a fraction of the cost.  

Pre-configured project management systems featuring workflow are available.  They can then be changed to tailored on a one-time or constant basis to fit a person&#039;s individual needs.

www.interneer.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to Coghead I would also like to bring Interneer Intellect to your attention.</p>
<p>Intellect is a web-based, user-friendly system that allows the average person, with or without knowledge of computer programming, to easily build fully-functional and extremely useful business applications.  Intellect automates the processes needed to deliver results with easy to Intellect is fully configurable without coding, companies gain the flexibility to adapt to change, eliminating the need for costly software modifications in the future.  </p>
<p>Intellect&#8217;s Instant Application Framework makes it simple to quickly create dynamic forms, interactive tables, workflow diagrams and collaboration tools such as due date notifications and sign-off requests.  As a result, the typical business user is empowered to configure the system whenever necessary, even if he or she has no knowledge of computer programming.  If you can get by in Excel, you can build sophisticated applications with Intellect.  Intellect allows for levels of flexibility and user-control not possible with hard-coded applications, at a fraction of the cost.  </p>
<p>Pre-configured project management systems featuring workflow are available.  They can then be changed to tailored on a one-time or constant basis to fit a person&#8217;s individual needs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.interneer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.interneer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mandel</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>Having listened to Esther on the subject of lightweight workflows before, I am starting to see how the need to turn a *business practice* into a *business process* may be a core requirement of Enterprise 2.0 software.

Many have been the efforts to make application development into a task that is natural for the &#039;ordinary&#039; user. Many have been the failures. Indeed, this was the idea behind JotSpot (just sold to Google), which debuted calling itself &quot;the application wiki.&quot;

Note that 20 years ago, there was an environment often employed by ordinary users to build (single-user) applications; it was called Lotus 123. It&#039;s a fact worth noticing that workflows -- call them &quot;social applications&quot; if you will -- seem more resistant to this. 

This discussion is interesting, and I&#039;m going to take this idea back home to www.connectbeam.com and think about whether building such &#039;workflows&#039; is a sensible competence to build into our Enterprise 2.0 platform at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having listened to Esther on the subject of lightweight workflows before, I am starting to see how the need to turn a *business practice* into a *business process* may be a core requirement of Enterprise 2.0 software.</p>
<p>Many have been the efforts to make application development into a task that is natural for the &#8216;ordinary&#8217; user. Many have been the failures. Indeed, this was the idea behind JotSpot (just sold to Google), which debuted calling itself &#8220;the application wiki.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note that 20 years ago, there was an environment often employed by ordinary users to build (single-user) applications; it was called Lotus 123. It&#8217;s a fact worth noticing that workflows &#8212; call them &#8220;social applications&#8221; if you will &#8212; seem more resistant to this. </p>
<p>This discussion is interesting, and I&#8217;m going to take this idea back home to <a href="http://www.connectbeam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.connectbeam.com</a> and think about whether building such &#8216;workflows&#8217; is a sensible competence to build into our Enterprise 2.0 platform at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2793</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2793</guid>
		<description>It seems there should be a way to streamline internal collaboration into external communication Â– the kind the cluetrain manifesto speaks of.

What is the boundary between IT and Marketing, when using the AMAÂ’s 2004 definition of marketing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems there should be a way to streamline internal collaboration into external communication Â– the kind the cluetrain manifesto speaks of.</p>
<p>What is the boundary between IT and Marketing, when using the AMAÂ’s 2004 definition of marketing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrunrbcsa</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>xrunrbcsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2798</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Otter</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2792</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2792</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating space- and most of the buzz is around startups with nifty names. I wonder if it will remain that way. Building the app is the easy part, scaling adoption and generating a positive cash flow are tougher.

The &quot;knowledge&quot; worker (i hate that term) desktop is too valuable for the big guys to ignore for long.

Herewith AMR talking to the SAP CEO. (http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.asp?pmillid=19834)

AMR Research: What do you think of all the buzz around Web 2.0?

Kagermann: (He laughs). Hasso was just here yesterday saying that we need to do build more Web 2.0 into our software. (He is referring to Hasso Plattner, one of SAPÂ’s cofounders and his predecessor as CEO at SAP.)  With SOA, you can have all these different user experiences with 100% business system integrity.

AMR Research: Inside SAP, your company is using a lot of collaborative tools like wikis. Do you see these becoming part of future SAP products? The primary concern seems to be the lack of security.

Kagermann: YouÂ’re right. We will add wikis and other tools when we can tie them into our security layer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating space- and most of the buzz is around startups with nifty names. I wonder if it will remain that way. Building the app is the easy part, scaling adoption and generating a positive cash flow are tougher.</p>
<p>The &#8220;knowledge&#8221; worker (i hate that term) desktop is too valuable for the big guys to ignore for long.</p>
<p>Herewith AMR talking to the SAP CEO. (<a href="http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.asp?pmillid=19834" rel="nofollow">http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.asp?pmillid=19834</a>)</p>
<p>AMR Research: What do you think of all the buzz around Web 2.0?</p>
<p>Kagermann: (He laughs). Hasso was just here yesterday saying that we need to do build more Web 2.0 into our software. (He is referring to Hasso Plattner, one of SAPÂ’s cofounders and his predecessor as CEO at SAP.)  With SOA, you can have all these different user experiences with 100% business system integrity.</p>
<p>AMR Research: Inside SAP, your company is using a lot of collaborative tools like wikis. Do you see these becoming part of future SAP products? The primary concern seems to be the lack of security.</p>
<p>Kagermann: YouÂ’re right. We will add wikis and other tools when we can tie them into our security layer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tory</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/10/boundary_spanning_at_office_20/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2791</guid>
		<description>We are working on an application called OpenTeams along similar lines, although with more emphasis on collaborative innovation than workflow.  We&#039;re integrating wiki, blog, and tagging functionality, and are very aware of the need to be as easy to use as email.  Neither the application nor the marketing web site are available for evalutation yet (other than an overview pdf), but I will let you know when they are, hopefully by the end of November.

Love the blog and the Enterprise 2.0 concept.  It provides a lot of inspiration to our team.  Thanks, and keep up the insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are working on an application called OpenTeams along similar lines, although with more emphasis on collaborative innovation than workflow.  We&#8217;re integrating wiki, blog, and tagging functionality, and are very aware of the need to be as easy to use as email.  Neither the application nor the marketing web site are available for evalutation yet (other than an overview pdf), but I will let you know when they are, hopefully by the end of November.</p>
<p>Love the blog and the Enterprise 2.0 concept.  It provides a lot of inspiration to our team.  Thanks, and keep up the insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
