Comments on: It’s Not Not About the Technology

By: Brajesh

Brajesh — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:36:26 +0000

You gave good information about the technologies but in my blog you can find best latest information about the latest technology which would be nice for you and also you will get full details about the gadgets.

By: muhammad

muhammad — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:10:47 +0000

nice work and very interesting post thanks for sharing you can join me at
http://www.technologiez.net

By: Get Ex Back

Get Ex Back — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:26:18 +0000

I have come to a simple conclusion: it's not about technology or being able to manipulate tools better than anyone else!

By: mp3 dinle

mp3 dinle — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:23:49 +0000

I think it IS about the technology. Without technology we wouldn't be having this discussion while we are sitting at home (or work, or wherever).

Sometimes people can forget though, it isn't ONLY about the technology. Once the basic framework is in place, its time for the end users to move in and put it to use. If no one uses your shiny new piece of technology, then it is just as good as a doorjamb. Thats why usability and appeal are equally as important as the technology that runs the thing.

By: itjobs1

itjobs1 — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:13:48 +0000

I agree with that. Have we all become more productive through using the latest version of Word as opposed to the first version? No. Even an increase in user-friendliness of software products has often been negated by an increase in functionality and therefore complexity for the end user. Similarly, when looking at blogs, wikis etc, INATT in this sense means we shouldn’t get hung up on features, we should concentrate on implementation and take-up.

Find more jobs: http://www.staffingpower.com/

By: Just another assessment of the E 2.O Conference: How Beautiful it is, and How Easily it can be Broken « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:43 +0000

[...] and usable technologies. I know that E2.0 is not about the technology. But it’s also not not about the technologies deployed. They had better be appropriate to the goal(s) of the initiative, and they had better be freeform, [...]

By: How Beautiful it is, and How Easily it can be Broken : Andrew McAfee’s Blog

Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:25:58 +0000

By: Explosives Automation

Explosives Automation — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:44:02 +0000

Technology had been a big influence for all of us no wonder why many people are into technology, technology had affected our way of living as we can see every house and store has technology in it.

By: energy saving devices

energy saving devices — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:38:50 +0000

Dear Andrew,

INATT – isn’t exactly right in my humble opinion. Only when a number of positive usages come out of a technology, people can use it, or can say “usable technology”. Technology takes a long time in the research phase to eventually come out ready for the consumption of the general public. But i think its a little disrespect to the people who work years to bring a technology in the usable format. Just think about Solid State drives – its a brand new technology explored right now which will eventually replace all the cylindrical disk drives.

My point is – technology should always be hailed, but in order to use the technology – there can be numerous determinant factors behind. Whats a labrat today may eventually open the gates for a whole new world of invention in the future.

Best Regards.

By: ZTR Man

ZTR Man — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:41:29 +0000

I think it IS about the technology. Without technology we wouldn’t be having this discussion while we are sitting at home (or work, or wherever).

Sometimes people can forget though, it isn’t ONLY about the technology. Once the basic framework is in place, its time for the end users to move in and put it to use. If no one uses your shiny new piece of technology, then it is just as good as a doorjamb. Thats why usability and appeal are equally as important as the technology that runs the thing.