<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detente</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/</link>
	<description>The Business Impact of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:08:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nursingjobs333</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-19166</link>
		<dc:creator>nursingjobs333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19166</guid>
		<description>very well written article.&lt;br&gt;For more jobs visit  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very well written article.<br />For more jobs visit  <a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.staffingpower.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trdedektiflik</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-13048</link>
		<dc:creator>trdedektiflik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13048</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trdedektiflik.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CASUS TELEFON&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trdedektiflik.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TELEFON D?NLEME&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trdedektiflik.com/dinleme-cihazlari.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;D?NLEME C?HAZI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trdedektiflik.com" rel="nofollow">CASUS TELEFON</a></p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://www.trdedektiflik.com" rel="nofollow">TELEFON D?NLEME</a></p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://www.trdedektiflik.com/dinleme-cihazlari.htm" rel="nofollow">D?NLEME C?HAZI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aby</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3857</link>
		<dc:creator>aby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3857</guid>
		<description>If something knew whether it&#039;s technology or others come up, always come with two different opinions among people who use them. And the time will give the answers which one is right and wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If something knew whether it&#8217;s technology or others come up, always come with two different opinions among people who use them. And the time will give the answers which one is right and wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dating</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3856</link>
		<dc:creator>dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3856</guid>
		<description>I agree, the interview was quite interesting with the claim of Â“Collaboration borders on social activityÂ”. All over very good strong points to be prudent about the ability of these technologies to transform organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the interview was quite interesting with the claim of Â“Collaboration borders on social activityÂ”. All over very good strong points to be prudent about the ability of these technologies to transform organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lutfi</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3855</link>
		<dc:creator>Lutfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3855</guid>
		<description>Its always any disagree about that. but when it happen people will forget it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its always any disagree about that. but when it happen people will forget it <img src='http://andrewmcafee.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gasdaglis</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3854</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gasdaglis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3854</guid>
		<description>In my view Enterprise 2.0 will &quot;eventually&quot; transform business, just as Web 2.0 will &quot;eventually&quot; transform the web...but not now.

Let&#039;s look at Web 2.0: True there are the Facebooks, the YouTubes, etc. but for the most part the internet hasn&#039;t changed that much. How many corporate websites are really Web 2.0?

In the same manner, I think you&#039;ll find Enterprise 2.0 taking off very slowly. I mean in my small business I still have some clients who prefer to communicate via telephone rather than email. So I believe you&#039;ll find the management of many companies (the one who are older and actually make decisions on which technologies to implement) will still want to use good &quot;old fashioned&quot; emails for communications.

Also there could be a liability issue with Enterprise 2.0. What about corporate espionage? What about statements made on say a &#039;wiki&#039; that could be used as legal fodder?

It&#039;ll be a while for Enterprise 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my view Enterprise 2.0 will &#8220;eventually&#8221; transform business, just as Web 2.0 will &#8220;eventually&#8221; transform the web&#8230;but not now.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at Web 2.0: True there are the Facebooks, the YouTubes, etc. but for the most part the internet hasn&#8217;t changed that much. How many corporate websites are really Web 2.0?</p>
<p>In the same manner, I think you&#8217;ll find Enterprise 2.0 taking off very slowly. I mean in my small business I still have some clients who prefer to communicate via telephone rather than email. So I believe you&#8217;ll find the management of many companies (the one who are older and actually make decisions on which technologies to implement) will still want to use good &#8220;old fashioned&#8221; emails for communications.</p>
<p>Also there could be a liability issue with Enterprise 2.0. What about corporate espionage? What about statements made on say a &#8216;wiki&#8217; that could be used as legal fodder?</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be a while for Enterprise 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Japan</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>Japan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>Nice write up, interesting read.  I&#039;d have to say that E2.0 is merely an incremental evolution of collaborative tools though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up, interesting read.  I&#8217;d have to say that E2.0 is merely an incremental evolution of collaborative tools though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIY</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>DIY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still not sure how anyone is able to argue that Enterprise 2.0 isn&#039;t a transformative technology.

Good to see some agreement though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not sure how anyone is able to argue that Enterprise 2.0 isn&#8217;t a transformative technology.</p>
<p>Good to see some agreement though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Firm</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3845</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3845</guid>
		<description>Nice... entertaining and useful as always.  I&#039;m glad you and Tom have buried the hatchet. 

&quot;Waiting for Web 4.0&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230; entertaining and useful as always.  I&#8217;m glad you and Tom have buried the hatchet. </p>
<p>&#8220;Waiting for Web 4.0&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit card deal</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2008/06/detente/comment-page-1/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit card deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3844</guid>
		<description>We recently had a similary sort of debate about using collaborative tools like MS SharePoint 2007. I personally found it really hard to make higher managment understand the benefits of this tools as they dont seems to have very good understanding of high level IT issue and just looks at things from financial point of view</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently had a similary sort of debate about using collaborative tools like MS SharePoint 2007. I personally found it really hard to make higher managment understand the benefits of this tools as they dont seems to have very good understanding of high level IT issue and just looks at things from financial point of view</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
