Comments on: Toward a Pattern Language for Enterprise 2.0

By: Frederic Simonet

Frederic Simonet — Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:22:58 +0000

1. Bottom-up content vs. top-down content
2. Personal Computer vs.World Wide Computer
3. Software as a Service vs. Software as a Product
4. Corporate Architecture vs. World Wide Architecture

By: lihaoxj16

lihaoxj16 — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:31:13 +0000

tiffany jewelry
Choose, buy and shop for on sale tiffany jewelry including Tiffany & Co Silver Necklace, Pendants, Bangles, Bracelets, Earrings, Rings and Accessories.
tiffany co
Tiffany Jewellery offering bangle Jewellery, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry
tiffany
tiffany and co
links of london
links london
Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewellery at low prices.

By: mailboxes

mailboxes — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:02:15 +0000

Enterprise 2.0 is the present and the future. I also beleive that web2.0 is cultural.
Different parts of the world find web2.0 diffferent then we do here in the U.S.

By: antikeyloggerantikeylogger

antikeyloggerantikeylogger — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:03:15 +0000

hiiiiiiiiii
dear friend's i read your comment's and post's they are nice and effective but i want to know more about something if you tell me some more imfo. or data about this it's very nice to me and thank's a lot dear.............

It's a nice site where people can do match making and look for their bride or grooms.

obama is a good person. he has a good political views on world deomcracy.

Antikeylogger

anti keylogger

By: sandyxxx

sandyxxx — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:53:48 +0000

and here is not a kind of SNS website (Social Networking Services).
so nobody think that's necessary to comment here..

hot deal--

By: gaylordaulke

gaylordaulke — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:56:47 +0000

Interesting Post. But is this a “Pattern Language”?

By: Barry O'Gorman

Barry O'Gorman — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:34:11 +0000

Just reread the post. I often find myself meeting executives who are reluctatn to 'deploy' E2.0 type approaches. Then I ask them 'where are you going to find new employees who do not use web 2.0 type solutions on a daily basis in running their lives?' You are right in your assetions re where E2.0 should replace E1.0. And in there your reference applications being in the cloud – this is a sine qua non.

By: slmader

slmader — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:34:21 +0000

Interesting, but frankly, these are such broad strokes that they're not really useful when trying to do something specific, like catalyze adoption of a wiki. Andrew, you need to look at Wikipatterns (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470223626?ie=...) to see a set of specific patterns that focus first on adoption, which then leads to the broader cultural shift you speak of.

By: pixbook

pixbook — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:52:31 +0000

"There is an ongoing debate within the Enterprise 2.0 community that E2.0 is not just social software inside the firewall. It is a change of culture. Well, that change of culture cannot occur without establishing the appropriate environment to foster it, including a coordinated set of capabilities, recommendations, influences, and incentives. The design of such an environment is social architecture."

Ways to make money

By: Barry J P'Gorman

Barry J P'Gorman — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:40:38 +0000

I would describe Enterprise 2.0 as ‘think global/ webwide’ whereas enterprise 1.0 was ‘think within the enterprise’. Enterprise 2.0 tools/ experiences are designed to avail of the cloud, the web, the browser, social communities. Enterprise 2.0 may be about deploying web 2.0 tools within the enterprise but the real point is opening up the enterprise – at least to encourage all people within the enterprise to leverage their networks which stretch way beyond the enterprise – for the benefit of the enterprise (and therefore themselves).