<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cloudy Future of Corporate IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/</link>
	<description>The Business Impact of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:08:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lihaoxj16</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-19657</link>
		<dc:creator>lihaoxj16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-19657</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moretiffany.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tiffany jewelry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Choose, buy and shop for on sale tiffany jewelry including Tiffany &amp; Co Silver Necklace, Pendants, Bangles, Bracelets, Earrings, Rings and Accessories.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moretiffany.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tiffany co&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ustiffanyshop.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tiffany Jewellery&lt;/a&gt; offering bangle Jewellery, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ustiffanyshop.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tiffany&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ustiffanyshop.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tiffany and co&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linksofjewelry.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;links of london&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linksofjewelry.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;links london&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewellery at low prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.moretiffany.com" rel="nofollow">tiffany jewelry</a><br />Choose, buy and shop for on sale tiffany jewelry including Tiffany &#038; Co Silver Necklace, Pendants, Bangles, Bracelets, Earrings, Rings and Accessories.<br /><a href="http://www.moretiffany.com" rel="nofollow">tiffany co</a><br /><a href="http://www.ustiffanyshop.com" rel="nofollow">Tiffany Jewellery</a> offering bangle Jewellery, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry<br /><a href="http://www.ustiffanyshop.com" rel="nofollow">tiffany</a> <br /><a href="http://www.ustiffanyshop.com" rel="nofollow">tiffany and co</a> <br /><a href="http://www.linksofjewelry.com/" rel="nofollow">links of london</a><br /><a href="http://www.linksofjewelry.com/" rel="nofollow">links london</a><br />Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewellery at low prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 123456789sbb</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-19615</link>
		<dc:creator>123456789sbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-19615</guid>
		<description>wedding dresses,wedding gowns,bride dresses,bridesmaids dresses,evening dresses,bridal gowns,flower girl dresses&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dress4sale.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wedding Gowns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dress4sale.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Formal Gowns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dress4sale.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cocktail Gowns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Find the wedding dress designer and wedding dress that&#039;s right for you! Browse dresses from &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dress4sale.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bridesmaid Gowns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dress4sale.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Evening Gowns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;View our selection of exquisite, handmade gowns and dresses for your wedding&lt;br&gt;Wedding Dresses, Wedding Shoes and Wedding Accessories from wedding shop, the UK&#039;s finest collection of designer wedding dresses. &lt;br&gt;Use the wedding dress and &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eshopwedding.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cheap wedding &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eshopwedding.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding dresses&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eshopwedding.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding shop&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wedding dresses,wedding gowns,bride dresses,bridesmaids dresses,evening dresses,bridal gowns,flower girl dresses<br /><a href="http://www.dress4sale.com/" rel="nofollow">Wedding Gowns</a><br /><a href="http://www.dress4sale.com/" rel="nofollow">Formal Gowns</a><br /><a href="http://www.dress4sale.com/" rel="nofollow">Cocktail Gowns</a><br />Find the wedding dress designer and wedding dress that&#39;s right for you! Browse dresses from <br /><a href="http://www.dress4sale.com" rel="nofollow">Bridesmaid Gowns</a><br /><a href="http://www.dress4sale.com" rel="nofollow">Evening Gowns</a><br />View our selection of exquisite, handmade gowns and dresses for your wedding<br />Wedding Dresses, Wedding Shoes and Wedding Accessories from wedding shop, the UK&#39;s finest collection of designer wedding dresses. <br />Use the wedding dress and <br /><a href="http://www.eshopwedding.com" rel="nofollow">cheap wedding </a><br /><a href="http://www.eshopwedding.com" rel="nofollow">wedding dresses</a><br /><a href="http://www.eshopwedding.com" rel="nofollow">wedding shop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: long nightgown</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-19508</link>
		<dc:creator>long nightgown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-19508</guid>
		<description>This article is very good. Useful to me. I will return to read this article and other article absolute sure. thank you&lt;br&gt;For my site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longnightgown.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;long nightgown&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is very good. Useful to me. I will return to read this article and other article absolute sure. thank you<br />For my site <a href="http://www.longnightgown.net" rel="nofollow">long nightgown</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott S</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18790</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18790</guid>
		<description>Is the move to the cloud inevitable? In my view, the key will be finding the strategic balance between using the Cloud vs. corporate IT infrastructure. It isn&#039;t an all or nothing switch. As previously menioned in another comment, a hybrid approach is likely the most realistic model. A key decision point is integration - many of the cloud based services are &quot;silo services&quot; and they do not offer integration (and if they do, security becomes an issue). For this reason, peripheral services will likely be adopted before core business services. Another aspect to look at - what is the target audience of the public cloud? We have already seen high adoption of cloud based services for individuals. For the small business sector, the cloud represents a huge opportunity to keep IT costs under control and allow them to focus on their core competency (which normally isn&#039;t managing IT). In the end, I think the cloud has made corporate IT rethink its approach to building infrastructure. It begs the question, what value is corporate IT adding in building out and managing infrastructure? If there is little value, can it be shifted to the cloud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the move to the cloud inevitable? In my view, the key will be finding the strategic balance between using the Cloud vs. corporate IT infrastructure. It isn&#39;t an all or nothing switch. As previously menioned in another comment, a hybrid approach is likely the most realistic model. A key decision point is integration &#8211; many of the cloud based services are &#8220;silo services&#8221; and they do not offer integration (and if they do, security becomes an issue). For this reason, peripheral services will likely be adopted before core business services. Another aspect to look at &#8211; what is the target audience of the public cloud? We have already seen high adoption of cloud based services for individuals. For the small business sector, the cloud represents a huge opportunity to keep IT costs under control and allow them to focus on their core competency (which normally isn&#39;t managing IT). In the end, I think the cloud has made corporate IT rethink its approach to building infrastructure. It begs the question, what value is corporate IT adding in building out and managing infrastructure? If there is little value, can it be shifted to the cloud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18791</guid>
		<description>Great post professor. Thanks for sharing. But it may look funny to most of the people. They may not realize the how much Cloud 0.0 already takes place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post professor. Thanks for sharing. But it may look funny to most of the people. They may not realize the how much Cloud 0.0 already takes place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razh</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18685</link>
		<dc:creator>razh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18685</guid>
		<description>The real question is not if your IT will be hosted on a cloud or internaly but how your IT is going to provide you a competitive advantage and support your essential innovation. Given that the cloud infrastructure provides reasonable answers to security, data protection and ownership, bandwith, etc. you still remain with the question how to innovate with your business processes to provide value to your customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having your IT on the cloud doesn&#039;t make it more flexible to dynamic requirements, more easy to integrate with some new innovative software, more adaptable to changing business requirements. This challange is and will not be addressed by the cloud architecture. It is addressed by the way you architecture your IT to support your processes regardless where it is hosted and as long we still strugle with the current monolithic and rigid architectures, we will continue to face the same challanges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The cloud could probably will become a good infrastructure that might reduce TCO mainly from an hardware / network / infrastructure and operation point of view. Reducing TCO is a real value and as such should not be under estimated. But still the real competitve value doesn&#039;t come from just lowering the IT costs, as important that might be. We still have a long way to make our IT architectures open and adaptable enough to cope with the modern competitive landscape, be it on the cloud or elswhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question is not if your IT will be hosted on a cloud or internaly but how your IT is going to provide you a competitive advantage and support your essential innovation. Given that the cloud infrastructure provides reasonable answers to security, data protection and ownership, bandwith, etc. you still remain with the question how to innovate with your business processes to provide value to your customers.</p>
<p>Having your IT on the cloud doesn&#39;t make it more flexible to dynamic requirements, more easy to integrate with some new innovative software, more adaptable to changing business requirements. This challange is and will not be addressed by the cloud architecture. It is addressed by the way you architecture your IT to support your processes regardless where it is hosted and as long we still strugle with the current monolithic and rigid architectures, we will continue to face the same challanges.</p>
<p>The cloud could probably will become a good infrastructure that might reduce TCO mainly from an hardware / network / infrastructure and operation point of view. Reducing TCO is a real value and as such should not be under estimated. But still the real competitve value doesn&#39;t come from just lowering the IT costs, as important that might be. We still have a long way to make our IT architectures open and adaptable enough to cope with the modern competitive landscape, be it on the cloud or elswhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guodan</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18681</link>
		<dc:creator>guodan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18681</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_4.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nike jordan shoes 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_5.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nike jordan shoes 5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_4.html" rel="nofollow">Nike jordan shoes 4</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_5.html" rel="nofollow">Nike jordan shoes 5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guodan</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18680</link>
		<dc:creator>guodan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18680</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_4.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nike jordan shoes 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_5.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nike jordan shoes 5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_4.html" rel="nofollow">Nike jordan shoes 4</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.myaj-shoes.com/Nike_jordan_shoes_5.html" rel="nofollow">Nike jordan shoes 5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Linssen</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18676</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Linssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18676</guid>
		<description>Good story on steam versus electricity!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my view, however, I&#039;d rather compare desktops to &#039;unit drive&#039; and Clouds to &#039;line drive&#039;, so it could arguable be used against the call for Cloud computing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nonetheless, I like the idea of Cloud computing, as we all have individual experience with it: we have huge x-core processors in our notebooks with way-too-much RAM and video power, that we only occasionally use for the full 100%, e.g. when we&#039;re starting up Windows - it&#039;s just too bad that we&#039;ve already paid for it all&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, in my opinion there are three major obstacles:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, it&#039;s nice to be in the cloud, just as nice as having outsourced to a new datacentre, but it&#039;s a moneydevouring operation to get in or out of it, which adds little value if any at all. So we need what I call &quot;no man&#039;s land&quot; clouds where outsourcers, contractors and basically any operator can walk in and out of - past the security of course. If we have to switch from clouds every 5 to 10 years because a contract ends, it will seriously squeeze the fun out of Cloud computing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, it&#039;s fun to do business in the Cloud but while you&#039;re at it it would even more fun to do business across that same Cloud. I do think that, at least for the first dozen years, Cloud computing will add a certain &quot;static state&quot; to the apps in there, slicing off a good piece of flexibility. Great organisation and control over your apps can make up for that. Governance and service orientation by superb A2A integration will give you a good buffer for those years to come, and give a head start for the enormous spread of B2B and B2C Cloud computing -in my view- will cause&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Third, public clouds are a bridge too far for many. We&#039;ll see private clouds, hybrid clouds, virtual clouds, up to the point that one could endlessly debate whether this particular cloud is &quot;really a cloud&quot; or just an ordinary data centre&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, I agree, we&#039;ll get there in the end, but not at that scale. Our current &#039;unit drives&#039; have become just too relatively cheap to turn into dumb terminals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good story on steam versus electricity!</p>
<p>In my view, however, I&#39;d rather compare desktops to &#39;unit drive&#39; and Clouds to &#39;line drive&#39;, so it could arguable be used against the call for Cloud computing</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I like the idea of Cloud computing, as we all have individual experience with it: we have huge x-core processors in our notebooks with way-too-much RAM and video power, that we only occasionally use for the full 100%, e.g. when we&#39;re starting up Windows &#8211; it&#39;s just too bad that we&#39;ve already paid for it all</p>
<p>However, in my opinion there are three major obstacles:</p>
<p>First, it&#39;s nice to be in the cloud, just as nice as having outsourced to a new datacentre, but it&#39;s a moneydevouring operation to get in or out of it, which adds little value if any at all. So we need what I call &#8220;no man&#39;s land&#8221; clouds where outsourcers, contractors and basically any operator can walk in and out of &#8211; past the security of course. If we have to switch from clouds every 5 to 10 years because a contract ends, it will seriously squeeze the fun out of Cloud computing</p>
<p>Second, it&#39;s fun to do business in the Cloud but while you&#39;re at it it would even more fun to do business across that same Cloud. I do think that, at least for the first dozen years, Cloud computing will add a certain &#8220;static state&#8221; to the apps in there, slicing off a good piece of flexibility. Great organisation and control over your apps can make up for that. Governance and service orientation by superb A2A integration will give you a good buffer for those years to come, and give a head start for the enormous spread of B2B and B2C Cloud computing -in my view- will cause</p>
<p>Third, public clouds are a bridge too far for many. We&#39;ll see private clouds, hybrid clouds, virtual clouds, up to the point that one could endlessly debate whether this particular cloud is &#8220;really a cloud&#8221; or just an ordinary data centre</p>
<p>But, I agree, we&#39;ll get there in the end, but not at that scale. Our current &#39;unit drives&#39; have become just too relatively cheap to turn into dumb terminals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Wittkewitz</title>
		<link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/08/the-cloudy-future-of-corporate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-18675</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Wittkewitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmcafee.org/?p=1020#comment-18675</guid>
		<description>OK, do smarten up teh discussion. What if Mintzberg is right in his synthesis in terms of new forms of organizations? If so, process modelling and planning would become obsolete. And also providing of high specified business applications that virtualized these tayloristic and taylormade processes. What if every element became decentralized and structures would become adhoc groups? Managers would be obsolete too, because they only do the communication between divisions and departments. Without departments there would be no use of all this old strategic planning stuff. I think, that we face the end of the organizational structures of bureaucracy and with it we will loose the need for its virtualization with web services and an IT infrastructure. Social software is the toolbox that replaces management and processes which will overcome most peoples inhibitions. To make this clear, offers like Google Wave will make deal not SAP or Lotus Notes in the cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, do smarten up teh discussion. What if Mintzberg is right in his synthesis in terms of new forms of organizations? If so, process modelling and planning would become obsolete. And also providing of high specified business applications that virtualized these tayloristic and taylormade processes. What if every element became decentralized and structures would become adhoc groups? Managers would be obsolete too, because they only do the communication between divisions and departments. Without departments there would be no use of all this old strategic planning stuff. I think, that we face the end of the organizational structures of bureaucracy and with it we will loose the need for its virtualization with web services and an IT infrastructure. Social software is the toolbox that replaces management and processes which will overcome most peoples inhibitions. To make this clear, offers like Google Wave will make deal not SAP or Lotus Notes in the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
