One of my earliest posts on this blog related how difficult it was early in the last decade to keep in touch with the guides I met while I was hiking with my brother Dave in Madagascar. In March of 2006 I wrote:
When we asked how we could get in touch to plan our next trip the answer was usually something like “You can call this number. It’s my sister’s husband’s brother’s mobile; he’s the only one with a phone…”
I just came back from another trip to Madagascar to visit my brother and his family. We went to the Andasibe park to see the indri (the largest species of lemur) and met an excellent guide named Jose. When Dave asked how he could get in touch with him on future visits, Jose said that he didn’t have a phone.
I was disappointed to hear this. Jose’s answer seemed to indicate a lack of progress on bringing the benefits of information and communications technology (ICT) to the people of the developing world. I started to think that little had changed in the country since I’d last been there, which was a depressing conclusion. I asked him “Why don’t you have a phone? Wouldn’t it be useful for your job?”
He looked at me as if I were a little slow on the draw. “Of course I have a phone – I just lost it a while back. I’m going into town to get another one later today. Give me your brother’s number, and I’ll text him as soon as I get my new phone so you’ll have my number, OK?” As he explained this I got the impression that he was sizing me up to make sure I could handle this level of complexity; I had shown myself to be pretty ignorant of communication basics in Madagascar in 2010.
Dave told me that the great majority of Madagascar’s people now live in mobile coverage areas, but that fewer than 20% of the population owns a phone. Even though the Malagasy can buy basic phones for as little as $5, this is still too much for many people in such a poor country. Instead of having monthly calling plans, most customers there purchase small chunks of calling / texting capacity as circumstances dictate and budgets allow.
Researchers report that people in the developing world are willing to skip meals in order to buy more bandwidth. It’s not hard to see why. Until very recently these folk have been living in a hard communications vacuum, and humanity abhors that vacuum. When the oxygen of bandwidth presents itself, people want to breathe it.
Does doing so leave them better off? Evidence is mounting that it does. An impressive study conducted by Robert Jensen among the fisherman of Kerala, India found that mobile phone adoption reduced price volatility and led to measurable, quantitative benefits for both fishermen and consumers. A follow-on study by Reuben Abraham found that “The free flow of information ensures the fishermen get the opportunity to drive a harder bargain than before.” Work like this supports the strong statement made in a special report by The Economist on mobile phones: “Their spread in poor countries is not just reshaping the industry—it is changing the world.”
My brother Dave is working to accelerate this change. He’s founded a non-profit named Human Network International (HNI), the mission of which is “to afford people opportunities to access and reshape critical development information in sustainable and self-directed ways using information and communication technology.” (I am the chairman of HNI’s board).
In Madagascar HNI has several projects underway in support of this mission. It’s working with Zain, one of the country’s largest carriers, to make basic development information available nationwide using mobile telephones. The concept is straightforward, but the end result is revolutionary. Anyone, anywhere and at any time can call an easy to remember, toll free number (321) and, using the telephone keypad, navigate through a menu of information options. HNI and Zain use interactive voice recording technology to make basic health, agriculture and micro credit information available. Why is this revolutionary? Because for the first time, the semi-literate, rural poor of Madagascar can access reliable development information on demand and for free, using a familiar device: their phone. Imagine how important this is in an information vacuum. HNI and Zain are working to make the telephone not only a communication device, but also an information tool for the developing world.
A mother can use this service to find out, for example, what vaccinations her newborn needs. A farmer can learn how to prepare a nursery for his rice fields. A rural entrepreneur can find the nearest micro-finance institution branch. And HNI and Zain have made this a bi-directional communication service, meaning users can ask questions, make suggestions, share ideas andcontribute content.
HNI is also working with other NGOs in the country to help them collect data more quickly and accurately. Aid organizations in the developing world often operate in a near-absence of information about what’s happening day to day in the field; with mobile telephony, this no longer has to be the case. At the end of every day, the organization doing vaccinations, for example, could have each of its health care providers text back to headquarters (or, to be more precise, to a server owned or rented by headquarters) the numbers of vaccinations administered each day, and the age ranges of the children seen.
Further possibilities open up if the mother gives her mobile number to the provider during the vaccination visit and opts in to receive follow-up messages. These could be used to share additional public health messages (“Don’t forget to give your child de-worming medication”) or to let her know when other health services will come through her area. They could also be used to send her a survey asking about the vaccination experience. Many NGOs in the developing world don’t know if their interventions are appreciated or effective for their target populations. They don’t know, in other words, how well they’re serving their customers. A bit of technology can go a long way toward remedying this situation.
As I wrote in my 2009 wrap-up post, I’m largely optimistic as I think about the future, and this is nowhere more true than in the developing world. Madagascar is in the middle of a protracted political crisis. Its economy and people are suffering, and I’m nowhere near naïve enough to think that a bunch of telephones and computers are going to solve all the country’s problems or lift it overnight out of its deep poverty.
But these humble technologies are, I believe, going to improve the lots and the lives of many, many people in that country, and in others. I’m with The Economist – these are mobile marvels, and we can expect a lot of good to come from their continued diffusion throughout the world, and especially at the bottom of the pyramid.
Let me close this post with a question: can you think of anything better for increasing quality of life in the developing world than increasing ICT diffusion and usage? This could be done easily by subsidizing the purchase of devices and bandwidth, and by supporting organizations that help make best use of these assets (How about free phones and/or bandwidth for rural mothers who bring their children to be vaccinated?) I know a bit about technology and just a little bit (largely thanks to my brother) about development. From what I’ve read, learned, and seen the combination of the two is already proving to be extraordinarily powerful, and will only become more so.
So my advice for helping the people of the developing world is simple. Help them acquire technology that lets them help themselves, and that lets others help them. To paraphrase Winston Churchill: give them the ICT tools, and they will finish the job.
Do you agree, or do you think this post is a technologist’s uninformed dreaming? Is ICT diffusion key to the addressing world’s development challenges, or not? Leave a comment, please, and let us know.
{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }
Absolutely agree. Esp according to education I think ICT might be the tool – and maybe the use of mobile technology is the fastest growing of these tools, just because it is the sort of infrastructur that is most reliable in these countries. What's amazing with this countries is that they are using the tools they've got and are making new innovative use of them instead of just giving up like we do when the technology is not working the way it should
No. I believe in the leapfrog argument. ICTs are not the solution to their basic and structural problems, but they are actually helping them making their lives easier and longer.
There's already one technologist's solution for the bandwidth problem. Crowdsourcing simple image, audio and text-based task by a mobile phone, http://txteagle.com/.
A short keynote about the service at Etech09 http://bit.ly/cfrMxT
I think your example carefully hints at a magic bit of the formula that is often missed by the development community. It isn't just the T in ICT, parachuting in piles of stuff whether it is sewing machines, tractors or PCs is ineffective. It is the C – that is communications and connectivity are necessary. The network makes the phone, the Internet connects PCs. A second point that I think is critical is that while we can facilitate and enable access to technology, we can't make it useful. It is the local applications, the local uses that situate technology and make it powerful. SMS services are just services, when the are applied to getting market data, finding a ride, getting health information (http://text4baby.org/) then SMS the service becomes SMS the enabler. I will never see the uses for technology as an enabler of development that the millions who could benefit from it will see. I think our efforts with ICTs need to as you say, be in providing the core tools so that 'they will finish the job”.
ICT is a component to the solution as it will increase or open the dialogue to allow people to solve their issues. And the solutions may be a better fit as than those suggest by non natives. It will not, however, be a straight line to success. The necessities such as clean water, pharmaceuticals, and seeds need to follow, and that can happen only after the political corruption is identified and pushed aside in some areas. Your brother Dave and other NGOs still have a lot of work. The unknown is the potential for nefarious situations to arise using the technology against those that are attempting to use it for advancement. Those that would use the tool for such personal gain may also be as innovative and those who seek to improve the lot of all.
In 2001, my wife and I visited Costa Rica and we stayed in a town on the Pacific side that wasn't well known by the typical tourist crowd. My favorite type of places in the world. What impressed me the most were the Internet cafes in the “rural” towns and the wide use of wireless technology.
In some ways, Costa Rica was further ahead than the United States in the adoption of technology in that they let go of the the primitive voice land-line approach in poorer sections of their country and went straight to mobile devices. In general, I think most technologists believe that developing countries need to be shown the benefits of technology before those countries adopt the available technologies. I think this approach is wrong and it's the other way around. Developing countries don't need to be shown how to implement beneficial technology…what they're really needing is the technology companies to actually move to a level of sophistication where the technology being delivered best fits their country's people, culture and economic needs.
How many years did the traditional phone companies try to push telephone wire to rural developing countries and in the end failed? It wasn't that these countries didn't understand the need to ICT…it's just that in many cases the technology being delivered wasn't really meeting the full needs of the people it was serving. To this day, I wonder how many of Costa Rica's citizens would be surprised that so many people in the United States still use “wire technology” for their voice phone needs.
It'll be good to frame ICT within the context of development to help clarify the diverse roles, application and benefactors.. How about :
“Can ICTs be harnessed by individuals and communities to increase or enhance livelihood opportunities and choices; and make institutions and markets become more efficient and relevant to more marginalized peoples? “
There is already indeed a rich ICTD discourse that strives to answer that question… however, ****where is the mass mobilization of funding and energies*** to move past pilot projects and academic research and local interventions and filling in forms to win recognition from prestigious yet penniless award systems? Where are the bottom of the pyramid efforts? Are the HNIs supposed to generate its own income to expand or scale; or are social entrepreneurs always be marginalized like the people they serve.
Maybe they do….but maybe not…. Perhaps the time has come for an private investor driven social entrepreneurship fund that is valued based on a socio-economic indicator set – allowing people like me to invest in such projects and see the 'social return' (or monetary return where possible). Somewhere between an Acumen Fund and a Kiva – with less arrogance of the former and more sophisticated than the latter. Traditional donors and their paternalistic approaches can't have the monopoly on what an innovation is- and academic economists like Sachs and Easterly can't be the only setters of the margins of the discussion. Perhaps when a market system for funding can bring in more full information, competition and real incentives for development innovation and scale, we'll then see some more well thought out approaches.
Ok, off the soapbox now, its nice that HNI is going past price info (market/price transparency) and into dev info – having health and agriculture info at one's finger tips is vital to making informed choices. In other countries, they use call-center models to provide this info and get users to pay for the service. I also like how HNI creates a space for empowerment (both economic and social)… Good stuff, please report on it more often and we can't wait to see this in Kenya.
Agree – the benefits of ICT are more likely to come in unexplored and in innovative use of it in developing countries. While this is a commerical aspect that mobile companies are grabbing up volumes of subscribers in these countries – who understands it better than the mobile companies of developing countries itself.. Bharati annouced a bid for Zain to take over its assets in Africa. A huge untapped mobile market – a huge untapped market for innovative use of ICT.
It sounds like great stuff, but what happens when the commercial interests enter the dynamic and start with their manipulative ways? For instance, advertisements on the phone extolling the virtues of infant formula over breast milk?
Yes, ICT is key. Hear Jeffrey Sachs explaining what is happening in Africa (3' video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEJCWQZvTCM
Hi there,
I am part of a project that promotes digital literacy for development in Madagascar. the project is called Foko Madagascar (http://foko-madagascar.org) where we train Malagasy groups in publishing local content online. We are also involved in the use of text message and geo-location to report events during the 2009-10 crisis in Madagascar (http://foko.ushahidi.com). We would love to have our many members (located in 4 different cities of the country) collaborate with HNI and your project there. I think we could both benefit from our ongoing experiences with digital media.
Best,
Lova
My brother’s main point is access to ICT in places like Madagascar increases productivity. This statement is backed up by solid research; The World Bank found that an increase of ten percentage points in mobile phone adoption in a developing country increased growth in GDP per person by 0.8 percentage points. The same increase in internet access yields a 1.4 percentage point increase in GDP. Are there other development projects out there that can demonstrate this level of impact? To gain market share, telephone companies in Madagascar subsidize the cost of handsets. Even in rural areas people can buy a new mobile phone kit for about $10 that costs $18-22 USD from the manufacturer. Even at these subsidized prices, $10 represents a significant barrier to entry for the majority of Malagasy citizens living on less than $1 per day. Imagine the impact of linking the free distribution of telephones in rural areas with a measles vaccination campaign: win-win, right? Now imagine people using these same handsets to access a free information bank of constantly updated and relevant information (health, agriculture, education, environment, micro credit, etc), in the local language. One further innovation: Imagine the possibility of these same people contributing directly to this information bank by asking questions, making suggestions and providing answers. HNI cooperates with the telephone companies and experts in each development field to provide national level access to development information. At the same time, we provide a public forum for people in Madagascar to participate to maintain local relevance. As Andrew wrote, the key is to provide “oxygen” to those living in the information and communications vacuum. People in the developing countries will do the rest.
Hi Andrew,
as usually your post was very stimulating and provoked the following pragmatic reflection/proposal to me: I live in Italy and here we have thousands of used mobile phones that are literally thrown away to buy new ones.
Do you (or your brother) think that it woud be useful to arrange a collection of used phones to be shipped for free to Madagascar.
By the way my company is supporting a little italian ONG who operates in Madagascar (http://www.amicidelmadagascar.org), maybe we could manage the thing through them.
Let me know if I can help someway
Lorenzo
“can you think of anything better for increasing quality of life in the developing world than increasing ICT diffusion and usage?”
I agree that ICT is very important and can lead to huge advances in quality of life. But if I only had $10 to give to 1 initiative I would invest it in either a clean water initiative or the education of girls. Both of which have strong numbers on how they contribute to overall quality of life.
wedding dresses,wedding gowns,bride dresses,bridesmaids dresses,evening dresses,bridal gowns,flower girl dresses
Wedding Gowns
Formal Gowns
Cocktail Gowns
Find the wedding dress designer and wedding dress that's right for you! Browse dresses from
Bridesmaid Gowns
Evening Gowns
View our selection of exquisite, handmade gowns and dresses for your wedding
Wedding Dresses, Wedding Shoes and Wedding Accessories from wedding shop, the UK's finest collection of designer wedding dresses.
Use the wedding dress and
cheap wedding
wedding dresses
wedding shop
tiffany jewelry
Choose, buy and shop for on sale tiffany jewelry including Tiffany & Co Silver Necklace, Pendants, Bangles, Bracelets, Earrings, Rings and Accessories.
tiffany co
Tiffany Jewellery offering bangle Jewellery, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry
tiffany
tiffany and co
links of london
links london
Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewellery at low prices.
They certainly do. And ICT can help in public health, education, and every other sector of development.
Lorenzo, thanks for getting in touch and sharing that information. My brother or I will be in touch with you…
a smart way to do it…
hmmm we're getting educational here
Thank you for the information your provide.
sesli chat
SesliSohbet
Sesli Sohbet
Sesli Chat
Sesli Chat siteleri.
People these days would skip sleep in order to buy more bandwidth. I'm ashamed to admit that I used all my savings to pay for VPS unlimited bandwidth. Of course I got my money back quite fast from my site but still…
On the whole Peru and Bolivia made for a fascinating vacation, ….. comfortable slippers on the north side of the Andes this winter
On the whole Peru and Bolivia made for a fascinating vacation, ….. comfortable slippers on the north side of the Andes this winter
{ 1 trackback }