The New Millennium’s Downward Ramp of Jobs

by Andrew McAfee on June 13, 2014

aa-unemployed-college-grads-300x198Recent research continues to shed light on the big trends in the US labor market. Unfortunately, many if not most of them are bad news.

As Thomas Edsall describes well in his latest New York Times column, it looks like demand has slowed down for even the most cognitively demanding jobs (in other words, the highest skilled ones) since the turn of the century. During the 1980s and 90s demand for jobs had a U-shaped pattern: there were plenty of opportunities at the high end and the low end (thanks to the rise of low-skilled service jobs) and shrinking opportunities in the middle. My MIT colleague David Autor, who did the most work to document this phenomenon, calls this the ‘polarization‘ or ‘hollowing out’ of the US job market.

A new study by Paul Beaudry, David A. Green, and Ben Sand looking at the same phenomenon finds that a very different pattern holds since 2000, with demand for even the highest skilled jobs declining slightly. After looking at this research, Autor observed that the pattern has gone from a U-shape to “a bit more like a downward ramp” since the turn of the century.

This is bad news for several reasons. One of the most important is that the downward ramp appears to be leading to a “skills cascade” in which highly skilled / educated workers take jobs lower down the skill / wage ladder (since there’s not much demand at high levels), which in turn pushes less skilled workers even lower down the ladder, and so on. Larry Katz has found that “lots of new college graduates are moving into the service sector, that is, into traditionally non-college jobs, displacing young non-college workers.”

Where this all ends is anyone’s guess. Edsall quotes Larry Summers at the end of the article as saying that “The single most important step the U.S. government can take to reverse these discouraging trends is to mount a concerted, large-scale program directed at renewing our national infrastructure.” Erik Brynjolfsson and I certainly agree; infrastructure investment is one of main things in the ‘Econ 101 playbook’ for restoring growth and opportunity that we put forward in our book The Second Machine Age (along with other economic no-brainers like fostering entrepreneurship, reforming immigration, and investing more in basic research).

Edsall quotes our book in his article:  “the transformations brought about by digital technology will be profoundly beneficial ones. We’re heading into an era that won’t be just different; it will be better.” We do in fact say this (and still believe it), but it’s inaccurate to portray us as tech pollyannas or utopians.

The quote above refers to the uncontroversial fact that tech progress grows the overall economic pie (to use the economist’s favorite metaphor). However, we spend more than a third of The Second Machine Age highlighting that the distribution of this pie is becoming more uneven (and hence problematic) in large part because of this same progress, and discussing ways to mitigate or reverse this trend.

All the evidence I see these days solidifies the conviction that our labor market is shifting both deeply and quickly these days. How long before we take action in response? As Edsall writes, maybe policy changes will come more quickly once large numbers of college-educated parents see their college-educated kids unable to find the jobs that used to be regarded as essentially the birthright of their class.

Tan Nguyen June 14, 2014 at 12:34 am

Is the only personal solution is to get educated as possible

Airwine June 14, 2014 at 1:51 pm

Long ago when personal computers were just become the mainstream rage, the cry was ‘export all those nasty old time manufacturing jobs’ and OUR kids will all be computer programmers and designers and sit in clean offices at desks and profit from a tidy future. So ALL must learn to program. PASCAL was the one of choice in schools in those days. How much time and money was wasted on that one. At the time I was in the computer trade and thought this was nuts. Only a relative few were needed for high tech and that meant many. many jobs would be needed for all the rest and those nasty, despised industries would be needed here and should not be exported. Well here we are. Will we as a nation import back all those despised dirty businesses that actually hire entry level low to mid skill folks, train them, and provide upward mobility? Or are we now too green and too elite for this? We will see.

Anonymous June 14, 2014 at 6:00 pm

Pascal was used in schools because it is a one-pass compiler. Choice was mandated by the slowness of the time-sharing computers typically used at schools in those days. And Pascal was good enough to teach CS concepts.

Airwine June 14, 2014 at 10:08 pm

And boy that really paid off now didn’t it! The point is that this is the example of complete stupidity in the face of the real world. How much money was spent. How much time lost. They didn’t need programming skills in the first place let alone this turkey. In my univeristy generations of kids in the biz school were required to learn cobol for no damn good reason. Not the computer science kids. The BA in Biz Ad kids. Stupid. Critical thinking and problem solving with out specific technical tools would have been better than and better now. I mean, teaching HTML to all? Stupid.

Bob Cannell June 16, 2014 at 10:09 am

This was 30 years ago. If you bought a knife and didn’t sharpen it for 30 years, do you really have the right to complain that it does not cut properly?

JosephRatliff June 19, 2014 at 12:05 pm

Society’s definition of “job” will change, or might even be eliminated completely.

Jobs are not an economic indicator any longer (at least in the way they used to be), because technology is replacing human work, but not profits. Sounds harsh I know, but the reality is this trend is moving forward, and I have yet to see someone provide indicators that it isn’t or won’t.

But, really, I think we all have a “job.” Laptop costs going down, our ability to create, the ability to publish etc… give us a job … it’s just up to us to find ways to make that “job” pay now.

Appel Mahmud July 11, 2014 at 12:59 am

San Diego Military Properties

San Diego Realty is dedicated to providing the best
real estate services to our Active Duty men and women of the Armed Forces and
Armed Forces Veterans here in San Diego and Southwest Riverside areas. As a
military veteran,Randy Vance, Founder of San Diego Military Realty,……..

“LIKE” Facebook Page:


darwisbong July 16, 2014 at 3:26 am

nice share , a informative blog.
tas ransel wanita pakar seo

Nat Irvin II July 20, 2014 at 12:05 pm

wonder what would happen if anyone in congress would pay attention to this intersection of tech and future employment?

qeby21 July 22, 2014 at 9:59 pm

A good share ~Thanks!click here

sutoro naruto August 8, 2014 at 10:10 am

great post, as we know customer is a king

best regards

harga laptop

Admins October 15, 2014 at 10:10 am
hafiz tri handoko December 3, 2014 at 10:06 pm
hafiz tri handoko February 23, 2015 at 12:55 am
Alejandro March 16, 2015 at 1:08 pm

the big problem of employment that exists in Spain is because we have been educated to be employees of companies, there is no education that teaches business ventures.

The work of the future will be online almost 100%, you must first understand how the digital world to seek business opportunities.

This article explains how the ONLINE MARKETING

Anonymous March 30, 2015 at 9:51 pm

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: